1000 Supporters

  • About
  • E-mail Messages

Blog

Search

Get Our Feed


RSS Feed Subscribe

MSBA Twitter Feed

  • Recapping 2012 session’s impact on legal system http://t.co/nbftSFAe 08:40:09 PM May 18, 2012 from HootSuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • Practice Blawg: New QuickBooks Trust Accounting Guide http://t.co/Tv2ToVTl 02:43:34 PM May 16, 2012 from Google ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • May 16 is last day to submit nominations for MSBA President's and Professional Excellence Awards http://t.co/FBpSb6Z9 07:53:23 PM May 15, 2012 from HootSuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • MSBA Board Certified Civil Trial Specialists 8th Annual Member Rewards Seminar. http://t.co/qv959sSO 06:28:16 PM May 15, 2012 from HootSuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • Published Letter Written by MSBA President Regarding VAWA. http://t.co/8czzamHB 02:31:12 PM May 15, 2012 from HootSuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
@mnbar

Details of committee proposals released

Posted in: Featured by steve on March 22, 2011 | 0 Comments

The Senate and House Judiciary committees have released their initial recommendations. The Senate proposal includes a 1% increase for the courts (to fund pension and health care obligations), and a 2.4% increase for public defense. But it recommends a 6.4% cut for civil legal services. The House proposal would also give  the courts about a 1% increase, and fund public defense at current levels. But the House proposal would cut funding for civil legal services by almost 17% – a loss of $4 million for the biennium.

The House proposal would also impose a number of restrictions on the types of cases legal services programs could undertake with state funding.  The proposal states:

No portion of the funds appropriated may be used to represent or serve clients: (1) in federal civil or criminal matters outside the jurisdiction of the state courts or agencies; (2) in suing or filing a claim with or against a state or federal entity; and (3) in advocating at the legislature for or against current or proposed policy and law.

Details of the Senate and House proposals, as well the House language restricting legal aid cases, are attached.

The combination of reduced funding and limitations on the types of cases legal services programs could handle would combine to significantly increase the burdens on the justice system. Legal services saves the court an estimated $5 million per year by helping screen out non-meritorious cases, settle cases before they get to court, and reduce the number of pro se parties when claims do need to be litigated. Court functions would be significantly impacted by a surge in unrepresented parties.

This is a critical time for the justice system – the committees are finalizing their bills this week. Please make sure that your representatives understand the importance of adequate funding for all the justice systems’ components. Please contact the Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee and the House Judiciary Committee. Thank them for their efforts in support of an adequately funded justice system, and remind them of the need to adequately fund all its components, including civil legal aid. (And to help us make 1000Supporters as effective as possible, please drop us a note letting us know whom you called, and what the response was.)

Senate Judiciary spreadsheet (74) House Judiciary spreadsheet (78) House proposed restrictions (91)

Leave a Reply

2011 Copyright © 1000 Supporters